<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New ScalaQuery Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://szeiger.de/blog/2009/12/21/new-scala-query-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://szeiger.de/blog/2009/12/21/new-scala-query-features/</link>
	<description>Stefan Zeiger's Software Development Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:09:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Zeiger</title>
		<link>http://szeiger.de/blog/2009/12/21/new-scala-query-features/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Zeiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://szeiger.de/?p=41#comment-110</guid>
		<description>An inner join is best written with the implicit syntax where you can use as many tables as you need, e.g. &quot;for(t1 &lt;- Table1; t2 &lt;- Table2 if t1.id === t2.id; t3 &lt;- Table3 if t1.id === t3.id) yield t1.a ~ t2.b ~ t3.c&quot;. Explicit joins over more than two tables have an awkward syntax and they still suffer from a code generation bug at the moment. See https://github.com/szeiger/scala-query/issues#issue/4 for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An inner join is best written with the implicit syntax where you can use as many tables as you need, e.g. &#8220;for(t1 < - Table1; t2 <- Table2 if t1.id === t2.id; t3 <- Table3 if t1.id === t3.id) yield t1.a ~ t2.b ~ t3.c". Explicit joins over more than two tables have an awkward syntax and they still suffer from a code generation bug at the moment. See <a href="https://github.com/szeiger/scala-query/issues#issue/4" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/szeiger/scala-query/issues#issue/4 for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://szeiger.de/blog/2009/12/21/new-scala-query-features/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://szeiger.de/?p=41#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Stefan, what would be your recommendation for an inner join of three or more
tables. Is it possible to post an example</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan, what would be your recommendation for an inner join of three or more<br />
tables. Is it possible to post an example</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

